Explanations Over Predictions: A Field Manual for Reality
404 Field Manual: Explanations Over Predictions
I write for people who prefer maps to slogans. Reality doesn't care what we believe—only what we understand well enough to act on.
Master Complexity with the 404
1) SIGNAL — Reality Check
There's an objective world out there. Your job isn't to decorate spreadsheets with forecasts—it's to explain what is, and why it behaves as it does.
- Hard-to-vary stories survive the storm; ad-hoc stories wash overboard.
- Explanations reach from the seen to the unseen and unlock new capability.
Field Notes
Bridge wings, gale force, blind swell: predictions "said" fine weather. The checklists that explained systems saved the watch.
2) RADAR — See the Unseen
Open a second path; the pattern changes. That's interference—evidence that hidden structure is shaping visible outcomes.
- Use effects as sensors for what you can't directly observe.
- Leverage the unseen to build tools (from imaging to computing) that multiply options.
Field Notes
On ships, radar makes the invisible legible. In the lab, interference does the same. Different domains, same discipline: infer the real from its wake.
3) COURSE — The Knowledge Loop
No final truths, just better models. Confidence comes from surviving contact with reality and argument.
- Hold ideas lightly; test them fiercely.
- Make error-correction routine—after-action notes, versioned decisions, reversible bets.
Field Notes
Seamanship for the mind: not a perfect heading—continuous small corrections that keep you off the rocks.
4) SHIPYARD — Creativity as Civic Infrastructure
Flip the default from preservation to improvement. Reward the question that upgrades the map, not the posture that guards it.
- Design for optionality: prototypes, sandboxes, safe-to-try experiments.
- Ship learning debt down: document why, not just what.
Field Notes
Better questions plant new orchards. "No low-hanging fruit" means your ladders are in the wrong grove.
5) COMPASS ROSE — Culture, Constraints, Direction
Uniformity is comfortable; curiosity is costly—and worth it. Define problems by what transformations are possible, not just by yesterday's equations.
- Hunt lock-ins (tools, habits, dogma) and break them on purpose.
- Frame objectives as can/can't transformations to surface real constraints.
Pocket Checklist
- Does this explanation survive a part swap? (+ hard-to-vary)
- What unseen variable would explain the interference I'm seeing?
- Where's the reversible bet to test this fast?
- What lock-in am I protecting because it flatters my past self?